Independent nonprofit claims analysis

CLAIMS,
EXAMINED.

Companies market in headlines. They disclose in footnotes. We read both.
Diligence Desk independently examines corporate claims against scientific evidence, regulatory records, legal disclosures, and securities filings.
Diligence Desk Dark

What is said is only the beginning.

A company may tell consumers one story, regulators another, and investors a third. Diligence Desk places those representations side by side.

01 · CAPTURE

The Claim

We preserve the company’s exact words, audience, date, and context.

02 · TEST

The Evidence

We examine studies, datasets, regulatory records, patents, and independent validation.

03 · COMPARE

The Disclosure

We compare public marketing with legal qualifications, risk factors, and securities filings.
The disclosure gap

One company.
Several stories.

The same technology may be revolutionary in advertising, general wellness before regulators, and transformational in an investor presentation. Each statement may be carefully qualified. The combined impression may still be unsupported.
HOW WE INVESTIGATE
AudienceTypical representation
ConsumersWhat the product appears able to measure, predict, or improve.
RegulatorsA narrower intended use with carefully limited claims.
InvestorsA large market, defensible technology, and accelerating growth.
LawyersQualifications, assumptions, and risk factors in the fine print.
Latest work

Current investigations

Use these cards for the three newest reports. Replace the sample titles and links when each investigation is published.

CLAIM CHECK

Wearable Accuracy: What Was Actually Validated?

A Claim Check separating sensor agreement, algorithmic inference, and clinical accuracy.

S-1 DOSSIER

Inside the S-1: Marketing Versus Material Disclosure

An S-1 Dossier comparing the public growth story with the filing’s numbers and risk factors.

DISCLOSURE GAP

The Art of Lying Without Lying

How technically defensible statements can create a materially unsupported impression.
Our standard

We investigate claims—not personalities.

We do not tell the public what to believe. We show them what the record supports.
Every report distinguishes documented fact, analytical inference, unresolved question, and opinion. Companies are invited to provide evidence and correct the record.

The public deserves an evidence desk.

Support independent scrutiny of the claims shaping health, investment, and consumer decisions.
SUPPORT OUR WORK