CLAIM CHECK · COMPANY / PRODUCT · MONTH DAY, YEAR

Replace With the Investigation Headline

A precise one- or two-sentence deck stating the material question and why the claim matters.
FINDING: OVERSTATED12-MINUTE READUPDATED: MONTH DAY, YEAR
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

What we found

State the conclusion first. Identify the exact claim, the decisive evidence, the material limitation, and the finding classification. A reader should understand the report’s central result without reading further.
Insert the company’s exact claim here, preserving capitalization and material qualifications.
Company source · Date · Link
01 · THE CLAIM

What the company said

Describe where the claim appeared, who the intended audience was, and the practical impression created. Distinguish the literal sentence from the implication conveyed by surrounding words, graphics, comparisons, and omissions.
02 · THE EVIDENCE

What the evidence establishes

Describe the evidence in descending order of authority. Identify study design, population, reference method, endpoints, sample size, duration, exclusions, funding, and material limitations. State clearly what the evidence does and does not establish.
03 · MARKETING VERSUS THE RECORD

The representations do not align

Company marketingEvidence or filingDiligence finding
Insert exact consumer-facing statement.Insert the narrower qualification, result, or disclosure.Explain the material discrepancy.
Insert second statement.Insert corresponding record.State what a reasonable reader was not told.
04 · OPEN QUESTIONS

Missing information we would like to see

Information requestedWhy it mattersStatus
Underlying validation datasetNecessary to evaluate accuracy across the claimed range.Not provided
Complete protocol and exclusionsNecessary to determine whether the published result generalizes.Not provided
Independent replicationNecessary to distinguish reproducible performance from company-controlled testing.Not located
05 · RIGHT OF RESPONSE

Company response

State when and how the company was contacted, reproduce or summarize its material response fairly, and explain whether the response changed the finding. If no response was received, say so precisely.
PRIMARY RECORD

Sources

  1. Primary source title, issuing body, date, and direct link.
  2. Scientific paper, complete citation, DOI, and funding disclosure.
  3. Regulatory filing or database record with accession number.
  4. Archived company claim with capture date.
MAINTAINING THE RECORD

Corrections and updates

No material corrections as of publication.
Add every material update chronologically. Identify what changed, why it changed, and whether the finding was affected.
Editorial disclosure
Diligence Desk evaluates claims, evidence, and disclosures—not personalities or presumed intentions. This report is informational and does not constitute medical, legal, or investment advice.

The public deserves an evidence desk.

Support independent scrutiny of the claims shaping health, investment, and consumer decisions.
Scroll to Top